A common question concerning the creation-evolution controversy is “What about carbon-14 dating?” This radiometric dating method appears often in the mass media news, probably because it is usually applied to fossil materials, particularly to those connected with ancient human remains.They thought that sites which had the same kinds of pots and tools would be the same age.Used tens of thousands of times, carbon-14 (C-14) dating continues to be an essential tool for archeology. I will attempt to explain this in an archeological (down to earth) way. These are carbon-12 (the most plentiful), carbon-13, and carbon-14.Prior to looking at the many flaws in the Carbon-14 Dating Technique, it should be noted that no radiometric technique is reliable.They all start with similar flaws, but Carbon-14 has more than the rest.In Nyerup's time, archaeologists could date the past only by using recorded histories, which in Europe were based mainly on the Egyptian calendar.
I have tried here to answer some of the frequently asked questions that I receive from students via email, as well as providing some basic information about scientific dating methods.
Radiometric Dating Technologies are presented to the public by evolutionists as utterly reliable clocks for dating earth rocks or biological materials.
There are more than 80 such technologies that are claimed to work.
Many people are interested in what the fossils say, and carbon-14 (abbreviated C-14) dating seems to make them say they once lived ten, twenty, forty or fifty thousand years ago.
As the reasoning apparently goes, with all this time available, perhaps evolution actually did take place.